Illinois law provides crucial protections to both businesses and consumers to help ensure they are safeguarded from deception, fraud, and concealment when it comes to trade and commerce. The Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act limits the use of deceptive trade practices during the course of business. Under this statute, a party who has been injured as a result of a deceptive trade practice can pursue a legal claim against the offending business.

What is the Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act?

Deceptive trade practices can significantly harm a business and its bottom line. The Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act is a statute that is meant to protect consumers by limiting the use of misleading, confusing, or deceptive trade practices in business. The Act specifically prohibits deceptive acts and the use of unfair practices in commerce, including those involving the use of fraud, misrepresentation, and omissions of material facts.

Acts that constitute deceptive trade practices can include things like a car dealership representing a damaged vehicle as new or tampering with odometers. Other examples of prohibited acts can include falsely labeling food products, making inaccurate claims about services, or engaging in any advertising that could be misleading to the public.

Under Illinois law, a party engages in a deceptive trade practice when they do any of the following:

• Pass off goods or services as those of another
• Cause a likelihood of confusion or misunderstanding regarding the source, sponsorship, approval, or certification of goods or services
• Cause a likelihood of confusion or misunderstanding when it comes to the affiliation, connection, association with, or certification by another
• Use deceptive representations or designations concerning the geographic origin of goods or services
• Represent that the goods or services have sponsorship, approval, characteristics, uses, ingredients, quantities, or benefits that they do not have
• Represent goods as original or new when they are deteriorated, altered, reclaimed, reconditioned, used, or secondhand
• Represent that the goods are of a particular standard when they are of another
• Disparage the goods, services, or business of another by making misleading representations of fact
• Advertise goods or services with the intent not to sell them as advertised
• Advertise goods or services with the intent of not supplying reasonable public demand, unless the advertisement specifies there is limited quantity
• Make false or misleading statements of fact regarding the reasons for, existence of, or amounts of price reductions
• Engage in any other conduct that creates a likelihood of confusion or misunderstanding by consumers

The Attorney General or state attorneys can take action against a business that committed a violation of the Deceptive Trade Practices Act. In addition, a party that has been harmed by any of the above actions in violation of the Act may be entitled to pursue a civil action to recover their damages.

What Remedies Can a Party Pursue for a Deceptive or Fraudulent Act?

Illinois law allows a party who was injured by another’s deception, fraud, misrepresentation, or concealment of facts while conducting trade to recover their damages. The intent to deceive does not need to be proven under the Deceptive Trade Practices Act — a victim may take legal action even if the misrepresentation was made innocently. It is also not necessary to prove competition, actual confusion, or misunderstanding to prevail in a claim under the Act.

A party who is likely to be damaged by the deceptive trade practice of another may be granted injunctive relief by the court to limit the confusion and misunderstanding as to the source of the goods or services at issue. Critically, a victim of a deceptive trade practice does not need to establish actual proof of monetary damages or loss of profits to prevail in a claim. Attorneys’ fees and court costs may be awarded in cases where the court finds the defendant willfully engaged in a deceptive trade practice.

When Does the Deceptive Trade Practices Act Not Apply?

While the Deceptive Trade Practices Act applies to a wide range of deceptive and fraudulent business acts, there are certain cases in which it would not apply. Under the statute, the Act does not apply to conduct that is in compliance with the rules of a federal, state, or local governmental agency. It also does not apply to the dissemination of information by publishers, broadcasters, printers, or other such parties who have no knowledge that the material is deceptive.

Contact an Experienced Illinois Business Attorney

If you are facing a deceptive trade practices claim, you may be entitled to take legal action against the wrongdoer. However, these cases are often complex and it’s essential to have a skillful attorney by your side who can assist you with navigating the legal process. Located in Rolling Meadows, Litico Law Group serves the needs of business owners and entrepreneurs throughout Illinois for a wide variety of legal matters, including those involving the Deceptive Trade Practice Act. We welcome you to contact us or give us a call at (847) 307-5942 to schedule a consultation to learn how we can assist you.

Most business transactions are solidified with a contract that specifies the terms agreed upon by the parties. It’s crucial that parties act in good faith when entering into an agreement — whether it be documented in writing or verbally. Unfortunately, it can sometimes happen that a party makes a false or misleading statement to induce the other into a contract. If their conduct causes the other party to suffer economic damages, the party that was harmed may be able to bring a legal action for fraudulent misrepresentation.

What Is Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Business?

If you’re facing a business fraud matter or have suffered harm due to another party’s fraudulent misrepresentation in business, it’s critical to have the representation of a skilled experienced business attorney to ensure the best possible outcome in your case.

In business law, a fraudulent misrepresentation is a statement made by a party with knowledge that it is false in order to induce another party to enter into a contract. A representation can also be considered a fraudulent misrepresentation if a claim was made recklessly to induce a party to enter into an agreement.

Under Illinois law, there are five elements that must be satisfied to establish a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation. These include the following:

1. A false statement of material fact was made
2. The defendant knew or believed the statement was false
3. The defendant made the statement with the intent to get the plaintiff to act or refrain from acting
4. The plaintiff relied upon the truth of the statement
5. The plaintiff suffered damages due to relying upon the statement

Fraudulent misrepresentation can occur in many ways, such as through written words or conversation. It can also be made by an omission or concealment. It can involve the defendant’s agreement to pay for goods or services, the condition of a property, financial projections, or various other matters. Common types of misrepresentation in Illinois include misappropriation of business assets, financial statement fraud, and misrepresentations made during the course of a business transaction.

What Happens if the Misrepresentation Was Not Intentional?

In some cases, a party may have made a false representation carelessly without knowing the statement was not true. While this may not be sufficient to rise to the level of a fraudulent misrepresentation, a court may instead find that a negligent misrepresentation was made. It is not necessary to prove that a defendant knew the statement was false to prevail in a claim for negligent misrepresentation — only that they were careless or negligent in ascertaining the truth of the statement.

A misrepresentation might also have been made innocently and in good faith. Innocent misrepresentation is the least serious type of misrepresentation and occurs when a party made a statement they believed to be true, which was actually false. Even if they had no intentions of deceiving the other party, a plaintiff who was harmed by an innocent misrepresentation may still be entitled to seek damages.

Defenses to a Claim of Fraudulent Misrepresentation

A defendant who is facing a civil lawsuit for fraudulent misrepresentation in business may be able to assert a number of defenses. For instance, they may be able to argue that there isn’t enough evidence to prove one of the required elements. In addition, if the plaintiff waited too long to commence a fraudulent misrepresentation claim, the defendant may use the defense of laches. This is an equitable defense that can be raised when a claimant delayed asserting their rights and is no longer entitled to pursue an equitable claim.

Coercion and duress can sometimes serve as defenses in a fraudulent misrepresentation claim. Although the conditions that give rise to these defenses are not very common, a defendant may have a viable defense if they can establish they were forced to make the statement under the threat of harm or duress.

What Are the Legal Remedies for Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Business?

To hold a defendant liable for fraudulent misrepresentation, the plaintiff must have suffered some sort of harm as a result of relying upon the statement. Often, the legal remedy in such cases comes in the form of monetary damages. Another common remedy can include rescission of the contract since a finding of fraudulent misrepresentation renders a contract voidable. However, only actual losses incurred in connection with the misrepresentation may be claimed.

Similarly, if negligent misrepresentation is proven, a prevailing plaintiff may also be entitled to recover their monetary damages and rescission of the contract.

Contact an Experienced Illinois Business Law Attorney

If you’re facing a business fraud matter or have suffered harm due to another party’s fraudulent misrepresentation, it’s critical to have the representation of a skilled business attorney to ensure the best possible outcome in your case. Located in Rolling Meadows, Litico Law Group is committed to serving the needs of business owners in Illinois and works diligently to achieve positive results for every client. We welcome you to contact us at (847) 307-5942 to schedule a consultation to learn how we can assist you.

You may also be interested in:

Business Litigation

Equitable Remedies in Illinois Business Litigation

Business Disputes FAQ

Trade Secret Protection in Illinois

Fraud can have a serious impact on your business and its bottom line. It can cause owners and investors to lose millions, injure the reputation of the company, and devalue the business. Whether the fraud was carried out by another business, a vendor, a business partner, or another party, the ramifications can be long-lasting and substantial. Certain types of fraud might not only be charged as a crime — you may also be able to bring a civil lawsuit for the harm the wrongful actor caused you or the company to suffer.

What Constitutes Business Fraud?

There are many different types of fraud that can arise in business that may lead to legal disputes. Fraud may involve knowingly making false statements, misrepresenting facts, or engaging in a complex scheme to defraud. The misrepresented facts may relate to projections concerning financial investments, the condition of a property being sold, or a party’s intention to pay for goods or services.

Fraud in business can also come in the form of the following:

If you suspect that you or your company has been the victim of business fraud — or if you have been accused of fraudulent conduct — it’s essential to have a diligent attorney by your side to protect your rights and financial interests. Contact the experienced Illinois business law attorneys at Litico Law Group.

• Deceptive trade practices
• Breach of contract
• Breach of warranty
• Fraud in the sale of a business
• Investment fraud
• Conversion
• Misappropriation of funds
• Wire fraud
• Forgery
• False representations
• Real estate or mortgage fraud

It’s important to understand that fraud doesn’t always arise as the result of an overt statement. In Illinois, an intentional omission is treated in the same manner as a knowingly false statement. However, silence itself isn’t enough to constitute an omission that gives rise to fraud. There must have been a duty to speak or some deceptive conduct surrounding the omission.

There is a five-year statute of limitations to commence a claim for common law fraud in Illinois. To prevail in a lawsuit, the fraud must be proven by clear and convincing evidence.

How Is Business Fraud Proven?

To establish that fraud occurred, a plaintiff must plead and prove several elements. Specifically, they must show the following: 1) a false statement of material fact was made; 2) the defendant had knowledge that the statement was false; 3) the defendant had the intent to induce the plaintiff to act; 4) the plaintiff reasonably and justifiably relied on the false statement; 5) the plaintiff suffered damages because of their reliance on the defendant’s statement.

Pursuant to Illinois law, a material misrepresentation must typically be a statement of current or pre-existing facts. A claim for fraud cannot be based on conduct that may occur in the future. However, when a statement relating to an intention to perform certain actions in the future is part of an overall fraudulent scheme, a claim may be raised. In addition, a plaintiff alleging fraud must demonstrate made an affirmatively false statement which contained the misrepresentation — a perceived false implication or inference is not sufficient.

A misrepresentation is considered “material” if the plaintiff would have acted in a different manner if they knew the statement was false. A misrepresentation may also be deemed “material” if the defendant knew the statement was likely to induce the plaintiff into engaging in the conduct, or it contained information a plaintiff would rely upon when deciding whether to act.

Fraudulent concealment is another category of fraud recognized under Illinois law. A defendant has a duty to disclose material facts when they have a fiduciary relationship with the plaintiff — failure to do so can result in their being held liable for fraudulent concealment. A plaintiff may also assert a claim for fraudulent concealment when a defendant failed to disclose a material fact and engaged in deceptive conduct, even when they do not have a duty to disclose.

What Are the Legal Remedies for Business Fraud in Illinois?

The remedies available to a plaintiff for business fraud in Illinois vary, based on the facts and circumstances of the case. For instance, if the fraud involved a contract, a plaintiff may be entitled to rescission of the contract or obtain their damages in connection with the fraud. There are several types of damages a plaintiff who prevails in a claim for fraud may be able to obtain, including compensatory and punitive damages.

Compensatory damages can come in the form of restitution, which is meant to compensate a plaintiff for their out-of-pocket expenses. A plaintiff might also be awarded the difference between what they would have received, absent the fraud, and the value that was actually received when the parties completed the transaction. Punitive damages may also be available in limited cases, including those involving gross fraud, a breach of trust, or malice.

Contact an Experienced Illinois Business Law Attorney

If you suspect that you or your company has been the victim of business fraud — or you’ve been accused of fraudulent conduct — it’s essential to have a diligent business attorney by your side to protect your rights and financial interests. Located in Rolling Meadows, Litico Law Group is dedicated to serving the legal needs of entrepreneurs and small business owners in Illinois. We welcome you to contact us at (847) 307-5942 to schedule a consultation to learn how we can assist you.

If you’re in a business partnership, whether as a partner, shareholder, or member, and you suspect your partner is stealing, embezzling, or otherwise cheating the company, take actions to enable yourself to prove it. Save all financial data that you can. Have access to the company QuickBooks file? Download it, and keep the file somewhere safe. The same goes for bank account statements and credit card statements. Save tax returns, payroll records, invoices, and receipts. If you confront your partner, he or she could, even if illegally, revoke your access to these documents or even to the business generally. Your partner may also start to cover his or her tracks. It’s wise to develop a plan with your attorney before you raise the issue.

Beyond securing accessible records, you should work with your attorney to develop a strategy for rectifying the problem. Tools at you and your attorney’s disposal include statutorily-protected demands for documents, corporate actions to end the misappropriation, forensic accounting audits, removal of the partner, or a fair value buyout of your interest in the company. In some cases, these matters are resolved through negotiation. In others, lawsuits are ultimately necessary.

When partnership problems become apparent, seeking your attorney’s help immediately generally pays dividends in the long run. Self-help early in disputes can create expensive problems to solve in litigation.